Jump to content
Kostik

This is scary

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, unicorn said:

Civilian power stations are NOT legal targets, but rather terroristic ones. 

There are no "civilian" power stations in Ukraine. Every power station is used for to supply power military objects or railways for weapon/technic transportation or manufacturing plants for munition production via power network - since USSR time Ukraine has single, united, state owned power network for power distribution to any object in Ukraine: civilian or military, so every power station for sure is connected to every military facility via that network.

When Russia destroys power generation, and Ukraine has deficit of power, it is solely Ukrainian choice whom to keep to supply - military or civilian objects, and whom to switch off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, forky123 said:

Indeed. Time for the west to supply weapons that can reach Russian power stations and other infrastructure since the US, UK and Russia are all ignoring the Budapest memorandum.

Well, then you may suddenly find, what not only Northern Stream's pipes are vulnerable.

And memo are just memo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, forky123 said:

Indeed. Time for the west to supply weapons that can reach Russian power stations and other infrastructure since the US, UK and Russia are all ignoring the Budapest memorandum.

I like Nicaragua! Nuclear missiles should be installed there! The world must be protected from murderers, rapists and maniacs from the USA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a reference to the proverbial idiom "Pot calling the kettle black" which describes a situation in which someone comments on or accuses someone of a fault which the accuser shares. In this case you saying the world needs protecting from murders, rapists and maniacs from the US when the same is true of Russia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kostik said:

Explain this to the Americans who are placing nuclear weapons around the world and posing a threat to everyone

You say that like it is something new. It's been like that since the 1950s - and all of the weapons are in NATO ally countries with their knowledge and consent.  So why are you clutching your pearls? It is 70 year old news. 

What is new is that Putin now has Russian nuclear weapons in Belarus. So, who is the one making changes to the balance of power? Isn't that change what is really posing a threat to everyone?  

Open your eyes to reality.

 

f1ee6c30c4fb5e51244ac5a370ffbd00.gif.2dc93b53d352fac8cd9046d549fba512.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Kostik said:

Have you seen the map? Where is Belarus located?

But I like the truly democratic government in Nicaragua. Nuclear protection from aggression of the USA empire is required

Your right, in the same manner the US should also provide Ukraine with nuclear weapons since the 1994 agreement where they gave them up has been broken. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, forky123 said:

Your right, in the same manner the US should also provide Ukraine with nuclear weapons since the 1994 agreement where they gave them up has been broken. 

American provocateurs themselves violated the Constitution of Ukraine. This is what destroyed the state. East of Ukraine and Crimea against lawlessness

6097.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Kostik said:

Have you seen the map? Where is Belarus located?

But I like the truly democratic government in Nicaragua. Nuclear protection from aggression of the USA empire is required

Indeed, Belarus is outside of the borders of Russia and closer to Russia's adversaries - that was the point you were trying to make (unsuccessfully) about the dreaded USA empire, right? 

Nicaragua is a successful democracy only by Putin's definition. Same game plan: you get rid of all the opposition leaders and get "elected" time after time basically by default.  Your definition of "empire" also needs a bit of work.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, KeepItReal said:

Nicaragua is a successful democracy only by Putin's definition. Same game plan: you get rid of all the opposition leaders and get "elected" time after time basically by default.  Your definition of "empire" also needs a bit of work.

You organize a circus every 4 years! No matter who you elect, nothing will change. The USA has already placed in prisons everyone who is against it, the number of political prisoners in the USA is the largest in the world

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kostik said:

You organize a circus every 4 years! No matter who you elect, nothing will change. The USA has already placed in prisons everyone who is against it, the number of political prisoners in the USA is the largest in the world

I guess if you defenestrate or feed polonium to opponents you avoid having to imprison them. 

5 minutes ago, Kostik said:

The USA has already placed in prisons everyone who is against it

Really??

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, EmmetK said:

Portugal President to Palestinian Ambassador: "You shouldn't have started it". It's really that simple!

Bolivia cut diplomatic ties with Israel over its bombardment and siege of Gaza and mounting civilian casualties

Colombia recalled ambassadors to Israel

Chile recalled ambassadors to Israel

Honduras recalls ambassador to Israel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Kostik said:

You organize a circus every 4 years!

Next time they will have choice between a war-mongering Biden presidency for another four years or giving the overtly neo-fascist Trump a second chance to steer the country toward becoming an autocratic enclave for the billionaire class and ultra nationalist minorities.

Biden’s response to the Russian attack on Ukraine was not one that sought an early ceasefire and diplomatic compromise. Rather it opted for weaponry and assistance to sustain a prolonged war in Ukraine as a demonstration of US-led NATO resurgence, seemingly not so much motivated by the defense of Ukraine but by an overwhelming interest in humiliating Putin and defeating Russia.

Biden added a geopolitical level of encounter to the devastating war on the ground, with the hope that inflicting defeat on Russia would lead China to give up any hope of incorporating Taiwan. This agenda aims above all to extend U.S. unipolar primacy as a permanent feature of the post-Cold War world, effectively a Monroe Doctrine for the world.

Such a provocative course of action was undertaken in the face of risking nuclear escalation and the likelihood of another ‘forever war,’ undoubtedly bringing the people of Ukraine prolonged suffering and accompanying devastation. In the background of such behavior is an apparent cavalier attitude toward the onset of a new cold war, which is already underway in the form of a costly, risky arms race, uncooperative problem-solving in response to an array of global challenges

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...