Jump to content

forrestreid

Members
  • Posts

    280
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by forrestreid

  1. 16 hours ago, PeterRS said:

    I agree completely and cannot understand why some complain about over pricing. When I first came to Bangkok and started regularly taking boys off in 1981, the expected short-time tips were 500 baht - at least that's what I paid. In those days of the baht being fixed against the US$, that was the equivalent of $20.

    I find charts of annual inflation rather difficult to read. but I found one which calculates what 500 baht would be worth now after inflation. The rise in prices over that period was 251.02%. By my calculation (and I am no mathematician!) that means the equivalent now would be around 1,750 baht. That today is close to US$50.

    phpOIE8XHPM.jpg.c8fe760e299f3746921b42449a48f2c3.jpg

    Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, during the same period the inflation calculator shows a rise of 222% in the US$ buying power.

    phpaV36W3PM.jpg.dd8243784b725c5c7fb9a670f79ab52f.jpg 

    What the baht figure does not include, I believe, is the general rise in economic activity in the country and the substantial increase in the number of better paid jobs. As has been suggested in other threads, I assume this must have had some effect resulting in the reduced availability of Thai boys for the gogo bars in particular and consequently off prices and tips.

    My view therefore is that all factors considered and over the much longer term, the figures illustrate that prices charged by bars for offs and the requested tips by the boys have actually gone down. 

     

    That tip may have increased slightly less than inflation, but I think drink prices and off fees have.

    For example, when i went to Tawan bar in 2013, the price of one drink was 300 baht. Now it appears you purchase a ticket at the door costing 500 baht, which entitles you to one drink

    In inflationary terms, 300 baht in 2013 is about equivalent to 360-380 baht nowadays, but the cost of one drink to get in the door is 500 baht now.

  2. 9 hours ago, Lucky said:

    Where is it located?

    I believe it is located on the site of the old Washington Square beer bar area, which also had a theatre called Calypso(?) Cabaret.


    That may make it a bit more easy to place for some of more venerable members.

  3. 3 hours ago, scott456 said:

    Hot, humid, air pollution,  noise pollution, chaotic, crowded.  These are just some issues you encounter when wandering around in this city.

    Being your usual ray of sunshine on a thread, I see, scott456. 

    I should have added to my suggested itinerary that one should do start it sundown or later, to escape the worst of the heat.

    But to be a "flaneur" means that you are, of necessity, in a big vibrant city, so noise and air pollution, and facing chaos and crowds,are pretty unavoidable.

    However, I dont think you will get another tropical or subtropical city anywhere in the world that combines Bangkok for the variety of street and bar life combined with the relative safety of your person. Singapore felt very pleasant and safe to stroll around in the evenings,but it was of less fascination.

    I haven't been to Jakarta or Manila (or indeed Rio or Bogota) but I suspect the feeling of safety there would be quite a bit lower.

  4. On 11/4/2023 at 1:29 PM, flaneur said:

    Thank you for the replies.  Forrestreid your post is brilliant.  I think I am back in Bangkok in a fortnight and I will follow much of your itinerary, for sure! You correctly make reference to Paris but it is also important to recognise London (in the past, Camden, and now East London) and Dublin. 

     

    Thanks for the kind words Flaneur, I think Bangkok is one of the best cities in the World for just wandering around.

  5. 23 minutes ago, unicorn said:

    OK. So why can't you name ONE? I would be even more impressed if you can enumerate the SEVERAL you claimed to have immediately thought of. 

    Well, one option to consider is a actually take the bull by the horns and launch a ground invasion, after making strenuous efforts to get the civilians to leave northern Gaza. That appears to be under consideration, although is uncertain as to whether Israel carry it out. Hamas are so dug in nowadays that the Israeli military casualties would doubtless  be horrific.

    In my opinion it was pretty inevitable that the Gaza situation was always going end up like this, once Israel allowed Hamas to get established  there. I remember when the Israelis evacuated Gaza in 2004. That was not part of a long-term peace plan, it was just a way for the Israelis to make it less painful them to control Gaza and the West Bank. When Hamas eventually took complete control,in the civil war with Fatah in 2007, I was surprised that Israel did not then promptly invade.  In retrospect, Israel should have invaded them, before Hamas had a chance to get to build  kilometres tunnels which they will presumably used to make it very costly for Israel to invade now.

    My opinion is that Israel had decided on an "acceptable level violence" policy in regards to Gaza. They decided it was better to have the occasional exchange of rockets with them, then to invade and try and root out Hamas.

    That has come back to bit them now, in a horrific way

    In fairness, a ground war will probably end up being bloody for Gazan civilians too, but at least the IDF will clear out Hamas.

    What to do from there is a good question. 
     

  6. Moistmango.

    Thank you for your trip report,I really enjoyed reading it, it was good to have one done in nearly "real time".

    Good trip reports are at the heart of the board and really draw people in. Having done a few myself, I know how long they can take to write. And you are a naturally gifted writer too, which make sit all the more pleasurable.

     

     

     

  7. I posted a review of Thermas Sauna earlier this year, after my visit this spring. You can have a read of it yourself here:
     
     
    My review was a bit more general about the the experience of using the place, compared to some other reviews. 
     
    The only other sex place I went was the "Night Barcelona" cruise bar. It is a small bar, with a darkroom behind.
    The evening I went the darkroom was busy, with mostly older customers. Definitely worth a visit. The pictures on Tripadvisor give a fair impression of the place.
     
    The thing to watch in European darkrooms is your wallet!  I would suggest getting hotel in the Gaixample, as the gay area is known, and then walking to the bar. That way all you need with you is just enough cash for a few drinks.
     
    I was sorry I did not get to more places, I would be interested to hear your review of the spots there after your visit in December.
  8. Thanks for alerting us to this, fedssocr.

    I had seen some videos by Bangkok Park before, but that example was particularly interesting. I hadn’t expected that he would be so keyed in to the gay historical sites. It was fascinating to see the photographs from the Babylon Bangkok, which I went to once about 10 years ago. And see what the site of it looks like now.

    If you have any interest in Bangkok history, the other videos in Pat's Vanishing Bangkok series are also worth watching.
     

  9.  I wonder how familiar with Songkhla people commentating are. I once met a guy on Dongtan beach  who was retired there – I remember he said that although it was sometimes a bit quiet, it was also a pretty town on the beach, and far enough north to be away from the terrorism problems. According to Wikitravel, it is a bustling university town about 30 minutes by bus from Hat Yai.

    But I agree that being wanting to visit Malaysia frequently does not necessarily mean that one needs to be close to the border, depending on where in Malaysia the boyfriend  wants to visit. If he wants to visit Alor Setar, that is about 3 hours from Songkhla, but if he wants to visit Kuala Lumpur, you are talking about a ten hour bus journey

    Compared to this, the 1 hour 30 minute flight from Phuket to KL may be handier (although admittedly more expensive).

  10. 55 minutes ago, Phoenixblue said:

    If you're looking for other nationalities in Pattaya or Thailand in general would the choice value still hold true? How about if in addition to Asian men one would like to meet say European guys (East European) would they be available and with less cost than in say Europe? 

    Well, the obvious answer to that is no.

    But then you could say that about any of the places mentioned - in Prague or Berlin would you see many Asian guys?

    And it can affect your rankings. I have stated Bangkok and Pattaya as my top two, but this is despite the fact that I actually prefer European looking guys to Asians, all other things being equal. However, I do like a lot of types of Asian guys, and the other advantages of Thailand  make up for this.

    But I suppose if you were a complete "potato queen" Pattaya wouldnt seem that attractive, no matter how safe or reasonably priced, or the variety of venues.

    Just like a "rice queen" probably couldn't be completely satisfied with Rio no matter how many varieties of white, black and mixed race guys there.

    I guess there are just a few places in the World- NY, London, LA - where you will get a truly wide ethnic mix of providers. 

  11. 6 minutes ago, macaroni21 said:

    Is there any point in drawing up overall rankings like this? We all have different tastes in men. We weigh factors like cost, language, personal security, differently. Our starting locations vary by thousands of miles ( surprise, some even live in Asia or Australia).

    Each of us will no doubt have some kind of personal ranking based on our criteria, but trying to develop a master ranking often comes with privileging certain tastes/criteria over others.

    Well, I think it is good for discussion, even if it is impossible to agree consensus.

    As long as people realise it is only a bit of fun...

  12. Always like to see people starting a wide-ranging discussion thread Premv3.

    However, as this board is very Thailand focused, it will be interesting to see how many options you get - I think for many it will be Bangkok, Pattaya, Bangkok, Pattaya....

    And to be honest I was a bit intimidated by the range and exoticism of your list, LOL.

    Nevertheless is my list, based on my comparatively restricted travels

    1  - Bangkok - Jupiter and Moonlight for gogo bars, and Arena for massage (I go for more hunky guys). In general the range of body types and venues is so varied, and the feeling of safety in the city so good, for the size of it.

    2-Pattaya - Boyztown for a Gogo bars, and Jomtien for picking up a guys in the host bar. 

    (I never made much of an effort with the apps in Thailand, as it is so easy to hire "in the flesh" so to speak).

    3. Barcelona, and the Thermas sauna. The guys might be of variable physical qualities, but for getting a big bunch of guys in the one place, and for a very reasonable pricing, it’s hard to beat Thermas.

    4 . Athens- For finding people on apps (in particular, Hunqz), the best place I found was the Greek capital. Plenty of guys and very reasonable prices. Athens was I found sort of the opposite of Bangkok, in that I found trying to meet guys in hustler bars was not that great, so I shopped on the apps there. You can see my reviews of Athens for further details.

    Other places we have hired include Istanbul and London. However, although I was happy enough with the guys I got there, I couldn’t really recommend either city as being particularly good for hiring (although both are great in other ways).
    In London, guys on the apps are a bit too expensive to consider it a "destination" city for escorts. The Villa Giani is worth checking out, although i never actually hired from there. In Istanbul, I visited the Aquarius Sauna, and hired from apps. The Aquarius was a bit grim, and I found that the guys on the Hunqz app a bit expensive, considering it was Turkey.

  13. Just curious about the twenty hour site outage we just had.

    Was that scheduled?  I don’t remember seeing any announcement about it. 

    When I got the message on Chrome about downtime, and went back to Explorer and got the message about the site being dangerous, I began to get paranoid that the powers the be for the internet were trying to kill it 😪

  14. 21 hours ago, Latbear4blk said:

    CoM is working ideally and without interruptions. Not only is their traffic exponentially higher than here, but the technical maintenance and support are outstanding.

    I think you jinxed the website with that comment Latbear4blk. Your comment looks like it was last post before this site was down for 20 hours. Maybe the system was having a sulk?

  15. 15 hours ago, PeterRS said:

    A perfectly fair account. Could one perhaps also suggest that Vietnam was not unlike Laos in the 1950s/early 60s with a staunchly nationalist regime in the north which was virtually a communist-like state? Like Laos, Vietnam was decimated during the US war and remained so in the early years of reunification. It was then one of the world's poorest countries. It did not start to develop economically until the mid-1980s. Since then its economic development has been remarkable. Yet Vietnam is also an authoritarian single party government.

    We can assume that the authoritarian government in Laos has severely hampered development. But had Vietnam started its development after it managed to kick the hated French from its territory in 1954, we cannot know if the country would have developed more quickly. We also cannot know if in so doing it would have dragged other countries in Indo China along with it.

     

    I would agree with a lot of that analysis.

    However, just to clarify, I never suggested that an "authoritarian" government is, in itself, a major restriction on development. Many non-Communist authoritarian governments, such as Chile under Pinochet, or South Korea under Park Chung Hee, achieved very high growth rates.

    Authoritarian Vietnam has had very high growth rates since it more or less abandoned trying to implement Communism properly in the mid-1980s.

    Laos, although not so far down this road as Vietnam, has managed quite respectable growth rates since the year 2000 or so. I get the impression that Laos is more corrupt than Vietnam (the main Achilles heel of an authoritarian government), which may slow it down.

    But, like Vietnam, it is now catching up with the likes of Taiwan and South Korea.

    By the way, I am not trying to minimise how terrible the experience of American bombing that Laos suffered between 1960 and 1975. However, I just don’t think it had that much impact on growth rates in Laos since peace came in 1975.

  16. 5 hours ago, PeterRS said:

    How on this good earth can you state that with any degree of certainty? You cannot. And I cannot either. Neither of us have lived in countries which were the most bombed in the entire history of warfare or had well over a million of our fellow citizens massacred by our countrymen. During those years, Japan developed from a bombed out shell into what was to become an economic powerhouse. During those years, Japan's exports increaased by an annual 15%. You and I have zero idea how much economic development might have taken place in Laos and Cambodia during the years of the illegal US wars and their horrific results. Nor can we determine how wealthy the countries might now be.

    In the case of Laos at least, the Pathet Lao campaign between the Fifties and the Seventies would have assured that Laos probably would not have developed much in any event in those years, as it would have been either involved in a Civil War, or ruled by a very ideological Communist dictatorship.

    Presumably the Pathet Lao would have taken over a lot earlier if the Americans had not been propping up the Royalist Lao government. So that would have brought forth a Pathet Lao dictatorship by the mid Sixties perhaps, which would have brought peace to the country at least. However, the Pathet Lao were believers in strict Communism in those days, and it is not known for agrarian communist regimes to have ever prompted a strong economic development in any country, so far as I am aware.

    South Korea was in a relatively greater state of devastation in 1953 than Laos was in 1975 (admittedly with far less dangerous ordinance lying about in the forests and the fields), but in the 48 years that followed it grew a lot faster than Laos in the 48 years since 1975. 

    I cannot state it with "certainty", but I think it is quite likely that the way Laos was governed since 1975 is the main factor in where Laos is today, economically, rather then what the agonies it went through before 1975.

×
×
  • Create New...