Jump to content

caeron

Members
  • Posts

    1,621
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by caeron

  1.  

    I can name them, Unicorn, but it isn't my job to do your thinking for you. Getting shrill at me because you don't want to engage your own mind isn't helpful.

    If you really can't think of any alternatives for the Israelis than bombing civilians, then I suggest you do some reading on asymmetric warfare.

    Bombing civilians hasn't stopped Hamas. It didn't stop the Taliban. (The US is as guilty of this error as Israel is.)

    What it does do is make the aggressor feel good while creating a whole new generation of militants to perpetuate the cycle.

    It's a lot like the war on drugs. It has failed utterly and completely, but omigod we can't stop now! Maybe this year we'll achieve what we haven't achieved in more than 50 years we've been doing this.

    Israel's been bombing civilians in Gaza since 2006. It is now 2023 and the bombings continue.

    How is that working for them?

  2. 2 hours ago, unicorn said:

    Hamas is 100% responsible. Do you really expect Israel to simply allow Hamas to continue firing rockets at their civilians indefinitely? No you do not. There is NO alternative. Therefore, you know as well as I do that Hamas is 100% responsible. They absolutely know the consequences of firing missiles from their population centers. It's preposterous to suggest they don't. 

     

    There is no alternative to bombing civilians? I can think of several immediately, it just requires that you value those lives enough to choose alternatives.

    Somehow I imagine that if those civilians were Israelis that Hamas was hiding among that the Israelis would find A LOT of options.

    This statement so de-humanizes the Palestinian civilians being held hostage by Hamas that I doubt there is any point debating. But those Palestinian civilians are people too. Most of them want no part of this either. 

  3. 2 hours ago, reader said:

    We’ve pretty much exhausted how it came about and what root causes we perceive that could be responsible. And as a few have opined, we’re heavy on the blame but light on solutions. Two American presidents—Carter and later Clinton—expended much high-level energy on bringing about a peace. Conditions conspired to undo those efforts. So what else remains to be tried?

    The other gnawing question that has yet to be addressed is why did the Israeli government fail to benefit from advance US intelligence that Hamas was preparing for some type of action in the near term. 

    I suspect because Netanyahu was too busy trying to turn Israel into a fascist state to notice that the Boogey man he'd nurtured for all those years, to ensure he had a boogey man, finally was ready to bite him.

  4.  

    Characterizing Israel as the attacked is overly simplistic to me. The Israeli military has been killing civilians in fairly large numbers for years. I suspect their families and communities are not at all comforted to hear the Israelis say they were trying to kill terrorists.

    I think a state of war has existed for quite some time with a fair amount of killing on both sides, though the Israelis win the body count battle.

    I don't think the chance for peace is much helped when people around the world pick sides in this conflict and thereby effectively egg the parties on to continue it.

    The conflict is unwinnable by either side.  Israel can't kill an idea, and Hamas and those like it aren't going to make the state of Israel go away.

    But, they're both going to keep trying because at the moment they're both more invested in the problem than a solution.

  5. "The men were models.

    They were seeking work as models."

    Maybe. They were paid for sex work. How much they may have been mislead or not is an unanswered question, and I suspect given the time that has past cannot be answered.

    _IF_ they were misled, that is a shitty thing to do. If they now regret doing it, or just want more money for having done it and want to extort the one who hired them, that is also a shitty thing to do.

    I don't think any of us can know which of these two it was. Their lawyer is certainly pushing the former to achieve the latter. 

    It isn't hard for me to believe that no promises were made. It is hard for me to believe future benefits might result wasn't implied. Then again, maybe some of these party attendees did end up getting such rewards, just not these particular ones...

    But, to Omega's point, I recall a conversation in this forum some years ago when I commented very positively about a siamroads.com guide I had in Myanmar. Someone suggested I should have tried to bed him (he was both charming and handsome).  I had hired him as a guide without any such agreement.  I considered that suggestion highly unethical because as the employer who had contracted for non-sexual services to attempt to now use that position of power to negotiate a "new arrangement" including sex would be an abuse of power to me.

    I think it can be very easy for some in power to forget that the position of power they hold limits their counter-party's freedom to choose. Saying no may carry implied consequences that those not in the position of power fear enough to make them do things they would never agree to if they were in a position of equal power.

    When I contract for sexual services, I am very clear about what I am asking for and offering in exchange, as I suspect most all of us here are. 

    (as an aside, I've enjoyed all the siamroads.com guides I've hired for local guide services.)

     

  6. Many of our first experiences sucked. Mine sucked because I didn't articulate what I wanted, I just wanted them to magically figure it out. (free clue, they don't.) Now, I negotiate exactly what I'm looking for before the meeting so nobody arrives with misaligned expectations.

    You also get better at judging who is going to give you the experience you want. 

    But, hiring is always a roll of the dice. Sometimes great, sometimes not. If that doesn't appeal to you, try to find a guy who does it for you, and just stick to him.

    If muscle worship is your thing, you might try Tawan bar. It's known as the muscle place. Just use the translation apps to make clear what you want before you close the deal. Be explicit. I found it a bit embarrassing back then to explain exactly what I wanted... and I didn't get what I wanted. That learned me!

  7. Musk has destroyed twitter. This latest attempt to save it will only hasten its demise if he implements it. Whatever the fee, too many won't bother and it will wither and die.

    Perhaps when it finally goes bankrupt, somebody who has a clue will buy it and attempt to revive it. If so, I wish them luck. It never had a viable business model and Musk's idiocy really didn't help. Does he really think advertisers want to be on a platform where he tweets that the ADL is the cause of anti-semitism on Twitter?

    I never much paid attention to him before he bought twitter, but I am now completely baffled how a man so stupid could be so successful so far. 

    He flushed all the brand equity of the  name twitter because he has an alphabetic fetish for the letter X. The mind boggles. The mind also stays well away from the place for now. I miss the porn, but I'm not being part of that shit show.

  8. There is plenty of evidence that he did this multiple other times to other men. Dozens of men don't come out of the woodwork to make accusations spontaneously. That they did not have enough proof here to convict doesn't make him not a sexual predator who used his power and position to extort sexual favors.

    I think the destruction of his career was warranted and self-inflicted. He can spend the rest of his life in social exile.

     

     

  9. 6 hours ago, forky123 said:

    If by messaging you mean obvious lies and by better you mean an audience too stupid to understand they are being lied to. 

    It is a disadvantage if you want to stay somewhere in the neighborhood of truth.

    If Manchin is only going to get in to win, then I don't think he'll get in. He'd have a very tough uphill climb and would burn a lot of bridges to try.  

    Threating to do it might get him something. Actually doing it, not so much.

  10.  

    I do think Comedian is a very funny critique of the idiocy of the modern art world.

    My favorite painting hangs in the Frick which is also my favorite museum. It doesn't show well online.

     

    download.png.7b319e03dd7fda2fc9b1e43d37d59d16.png

     

    It is Antwerp: Van Goyen Looking Out for a Subject by Turner.  In person, the light streaming through the clouds is just breathtaking to me.

     

  11. I have always found the art market to be incomprehensible. The modern art market at least seems to be entirely made up of mad trend chasers. A few lucky artists get named the "in crowd" and people flock to pay ridiculous amounts for their work.

    Watched a good documentary "The Price of Everything" about it. Not sure it gave me any more insight into the madness. I was less than impressed with many of the pieces that were selling for huge amounts.

    For example, why in the world is Rothko such an acclaimed artist for painting things like this which sold for $45M in 2014?

    la-et-cm-mark-rothko-painting-sothebys-a

     

    Baffling.

    It feels like the rich people version of designer clothes. You buy a label to tell people you have taste instead of, you know, having taste. Art for the rich and insecure.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...